Re: Pipe dreams

[Robert Holmgren holmgren@xxxxxxxx]

** Reply to note from xywrite@xxxxxxxx Tue, 10 Nov 1998 8:18:01 -0500

> My second-hand understanding of the laws is that, as long
> as you've not seen the source code, no one can say you stole intellectual
> property.

Wasn't the signal thing about the Lotus 1-2-3 suit that it held that look-and-feel
was indeed intellectual property? The implication being, that you don't need to
see the code to infringe on rights. Or am I misremembering the outcome?


-----------
Robert Holmgren
holmgren@xxxxxxxx
-----------