Re: Carl's notes

[Carl Distefano cld@xxxxxxxx]

Reply to note from Harry Binswanger  Mon, 01 Sep
2008 00:10:23 -0400

> God, you've gone to a lot of trouble, but it [frame VA@*]
> should be a permanent resource. Hope it will be included
> in the next U2.

Maybe. We'll see. I'm waiting for Robert's feedback. It's something
of a niche concept, because if you're sure you're within the 77-byte
limit, you'll use the native VA@ operator; and if you're sure you're
over the 77-byte limit, or if there's a possibility you might be
over the limit, then using XS directly is arguably preferable. Frame
VA@* simplifies the coding of these XS parses, and I suppose there's
utility in that.

Did I make the usage clear? For example:

>

becomes

JM 2.VA@18,25Q2 >.

--
Carl Distefano
cld@xxxxxxxx