Re: BC vs. BX: Holmgren's elucidation

[Harry Binswanger hb@xxxxxxxx]

At 03:02 AM 1/26/97 EST, you wrote:
>As Holmgren has since pointed out, it was unwise of me to complain about
>"BX...Q2" problems (i.e. that putting new "BX...Q2" in place of old "BC...XC"
>made my programs crash instead of speeding them up) without giving some
>specifics. I'll have to try to deliberately reproduce the effect and give the
>List a fuller account.
>
>But meanwhile I *can* say that the argument which lay between "BX" and "Q2" was
>of the simplest kind imaginable -- e.g.
>		BC se /***/XC    versus    BX se /***/Q2
>-- because that's almost the greatest sophistication my XPLs ever rise to. So

BX se/***/Q2 works fine on my Xy4Dos v. 4.017.

Regards,

Harry Binswanger
hb@xxxxxxxx