[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][ Date Index][ Subject Index]

Re: vDos-lfn for XyWrite 1.01 beta



Hi Paul,

Then I guess there is no such limitation in config.txt in earlier versions of vDos too. However, the 8.3 file names are enforced in the command line and internal file system of vDosXy or original vDos. This limitation does not exist in vDos-lfn, which supports both SFNs and LFNs.

Wengier


On Monday, June 13, 2016 10:29 PM, Paul Lagasse wrote:


I tested a number of fonts in vDosXy and used the full filenames, e.g., FreeMonoBold.ttf,

Paul
Paul Lagasse mailto:pglagasse@xxxxxxxx
On 06/13/2016 09:19 PM, Wengier W (Redacted sender wengierwu for DMARC) wrote:
Hi Carl,

I am not sure about vDosXy but it is certainly not true for vDos-lfn. The file Nouveau_IBM.ttf (in its original name) is shipped with recent builds of vDos-lfn and works very well with it. Indeed, vDos-lfn is in no way limited to 8.3 names (remember that "lfn" stands for long file names). Thus, you can safely revert to the original file name with the vDos-lfn for XyWrite installation.

Sincerely,
Wengier


On Monday, June 13, 2016 9:02 PM, Carl Distefano mailto:cld@xxxxxxxx wrote:


Reply to note from Wengier W mailto:wengierwu@xxxxxxxx Tue, 14 Jun 2016
00:28:46 +0000 (UTC)

Wengier,

I was wondering about the Nouveau_IBM font filename as well. I added
that font to the package when vDosXy first came out in the Fall of
2014. I was under the impression that CONFIG.TXT at that time required
8.3 filenames, so I renamed it to NOUVEAU1.TTF. Maybe that is not true
with vDos-lfn. If CONFIG.TXT under vDos-lfn accepts LFNs, then I think
we should go with the original filename of Nouveau_IBM.ttf.


Best,

Carl