Re: Problem with SEarch in Notabene

[Paul Breeze paul.breeze@xxxxxxxx]

Dear Robert

So far as I can remember I have never called U2 under NB, having heeded
the warning before. However I did also follow the alternative option
and replace CHARUD.TBL with the XY version just in case I called it by
mistake.

I normally use the built-in SE when SEarching the current file but I
have just tried the U2 routine and it works perfectly under those
circumstances. However as soon as I try to search a fileset it fails.
I believe I have made all the changes necessary in order to run U2
successfully under NB, and other routines that I have tried function.
Is there anything obvious that comes to mind which I might have omitted
that could lead to this result?

Thanks

Best wishes

Paul

Robert Holmgren wrote:

** Reply to message from Paul Breeze
 on Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:52:56 +0100


Have you had any difficulty with this routine with Notabene?
If not then I must assume it is something unique to my setup.


No problem here, under SWS 8.0i. I tried searching within
current document, and also in file sets:
SE [d:\path\]filename*.ext*|searchterm(s)|. Worked fine. Can't
think of any reason why it _wouldn't_ work! Maybe you have a
screwed-up U2... Did you ever CAll U2 under NB without using
"CA/100" syntax?? If you did, U2 is wrecked and must be
refreshed. Tip: Edit U2 with Xy4 only, then there's no risk of
unintended alteration to U2 code. See further:
 http://users.datarealm.com/xywwweb/XYWEBTXT.HTM
then search for "Very Important".

R.

-----------------------------
Robert Holmgren
holmgren@xxxxxxxx
-----------------------------