[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][ Date Index][ Subject Index]

Re: vDos 2015.11.01 or 2016.06.01?

Subject: Re: vDos 2015.11.01 or 2016.06.01?
From: "Wengier W" dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxx (Redacted sender "wengierwu" for DMARC)
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 23:55:25 +0000 (UTC)

Hi,

Great! I will continue to release vDos-lfn builds based on vDos 2015.11 since I believe vDos 2015.11.01 is in general more stable than vDos 2016.06.01, which is not limited to certain specific issues. I will also look at the features that Carl mentioned. Thanks for your responses.

Wengier
 

    On Sunday, June 5, 2016 7:15 PM, James Woolley  wrote:


 I completely agree with Carl, Wengier.

James

Prev by Date: Re: vDos 2015.11.01 or 2016.06.01?
Next by Date: Re: vDos 2015.11.01 or 2016.06.01?
Previous by thread: Re: vDos 2015.11.01 or 2016.06.01?
Next by thread: Re: vDos 2015.11.01 or 2016.06.01?
Index(es):
- Date
- Subject