[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][ Date Index][ Subject Index]

Re: Military time (whoops!)



Please insert the word "theorems" in the right place in the
penultimate sentence of my post.

On Jun 19, at 9:05 PM, David Auerbach wrote:
On Jun 19, at 2:47 PM, Harry Binswanger wrote:
No, they just ended up linking the various invocations of Cantor's
Theorem, about which I *was* going to have a footnote but then
ellipsis happened and....
Re Cantor's proof: are you referring to (but not mentioning!)
diagonalization?
Yep. (Although that's not the only proof, the general method Cantor
used has gained the honorific "diagonalization". In latter guises,
it re-emerges (Patricia, do I need a hyphen there?) as various
fixed point theorems. These range from the Burali-Forti Theorem
(or paradox, depending on how you take it) to various Tarski
theorems (on the definability of the semantic notion of truth) to
the Gödel Theorems (on the essential incompleteness of formal
systems); it has a quite lovely history.
 For those who want incredibly fun but still accurate entrée to the
above there are some wonderful puzzle books by Raymond Smullyan
that cover the territory. I'm thinkin particularly of "What is the
Name of This Book", "The Lady or the Tiger" and "Forever
Undecided". (Reading suggestion (is anyone still reading?) is one
of the first two and then the last.)
Warning: Do not surf newsgroups and the unmoderated web for info on
the above matters. It attracts cranks. Almost exactly the same
cranks who don't like it that .999...=1.  There's a sociology
thesis waiting about which mathematical are crank fodder. In past
centuries it was squaring the circle; Hobbes was a prominent crank
in that arena.


David Auerbach
Department of Philosophy & Religion
Box 8103	
Raleigh, NC 27695-8103 http:// slowfoodusa.org auerbach@xxxxxxxx http:// slowfoodtriangle.org


David Auerbach
Department of Philosophy & Religion
Box 8103	
Raleigh, NC 27695-8103 http:// slowfoodusa.org auerbach@xxxxxxxx http:// slowfoodtriangle.org