Carl Distefano wrote:You mean, it solves the problem you encountered with your -"b" example earlier today? I'm not sure why it would -- but glad anyway.Yes, the problem is solved. The same test gives now the right numbers.Here's a slight revision. Expands the final PRompt (adds a reminder of the characters that were excluded from the count), and restores the original display type.Good idea in both cases. I'll test it inmediately and I'll report. Best regards, Manuel Castelao