[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: Xy III & faulty memory?
- Subject: Re: Xy III & faulty memory?
- From: "Harrison, Shawn" shawn_harrison@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 13:52:54 -0500
> When, pursuing [Shawn Harrison's] strategy, I reduce it to
>
> >
>
> then I get "Mismatched [logical or numeric] operands"
My silly proposal has generated a lot of testing and discussion, I see. I
guess I'd better explain what I was thinking. In my haste (shooting from
the hip, or rather fingertip), I confused =0> with
==true>, which is of course wordy. So I suggested >,
thinking I was talking about >, which of course is legal. I was
also confusing XPL with the C-like language in which I've been doing most
of my programming lately (Tcl, for those interested), in which the
equivalent of > is legal, given a variable which contains a
boolean value. Sorry about the confusion.
============================
Shawn Harrison
Associate Editor
Tyndale House Publishers
shawn_harrison@xxxxxxxx
============================
"The legal system is not fun, but it *is* an improvement
over duels and feuds." --Harvey Harrison, attorney