At 12/29/2004 01:35 AM -0500, Robert Holmgren wrote:Moving forward I have a question. Here's the original path statement taken verbatim from the E-Variables dialog: C:\PROGRAM FILES\THINKPAD\UTILITIES;%SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem;C:\Program Files\ATI Technologies\ATI Control Panel;C:\Program Files\PC-Doctor for Windows\services;C:\Program Files\Executive Software\Diskeeper\;%SystemDrive%\IBMTOOLS\Python22;C:\XY\;C:\NBWIN7\ I wasn't sure you could begin a PATH statement just by moving the second item in the list -- %SystemRoot%\system32 -- to the front so I, in effect, duplicated it in the beginning with *C:\WINDOWS\System32*. I left what is now the third item -- %SystemRoot%\system32 -- creating a redundancy. Right? Or should I simply have moved %SystemRoot%\system32 forward. I notice when you go to a DOS prompt and issue *echo %systemroot% I get *C:\Windows* I'm not sure of the XP PATH conventions. Michael Norman> instructions say to put> KMD.EXE in the *first* directory in the path. For me that's actually a kind> of distant subdirectory: C:\PROGRAM > FILES\THINKPAD\UTILITIES;C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32;C:\WINDOWS......Put it in C:\WINDOWS\system32. Move the THINKPAD dirs further back in the PATH spec. IBM has a habit of adding their PATHs to the front of the spec -- betterto be first than last. But system32 *should* be first.