[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: FW: Re: FW: Windows 95
- Subject: Re: FW: Re: FW: Windows 95
- From: Harmon F Seaver hseaver@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 19:11:18 -0500 (CDT)
>I installed Win95 over a Win 3.1 load on my home PC and the XW
runs >better. Have not found anything yet that is strange except
for the >annoying spell checker and a few other rough edges
which apply to >XW. I also have it at work on Win95 and sure
like better than Win >OS2 or Win 3.1
>
On the other hand, it won't multi-task 32bit apps, is much
slower than warp, and will actually boot up and run in dos window
in OS/2 -- also, when you are running it, you should run
Microsfts nice MSD.exe utility (included) which will tell you
that it isn't anything but DOS 7 and enhanced win31.
-- Harmon Seaver hseaver@xxxxxxxx hseaver@xxxxxxxx
seaverh@xxxxxxxx
We have found the Fountain of Youth in Asia!