[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: MW functions?
- Subject: Re: MW functions?
- From: "Yo Intl." rrr@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 13:52:49 +0900
Carl Distefano:
>The function calls are coded incorrectly. The second pair of
>letters is an argument (plain text), not another function. So the
>assignments should look like this:
>
>82=MW,p,a
>83=MW,c,u
>
>Or, more concisely:
>
>82=MWp,a
>83=MWc,u
Most interesting. Would there also be an "MW,c,o" for copying, rather than
snipping? Which is the function I most often use.
-- Rene von Rentzell, Tokyo