[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: Harmon Seaver: Why?
- Subject: Re: Harmon Seaver: Why?
- From: rtenn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (R Tennenbaum)
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 96 11:00:36 EDT
Harmon --
Nah, instead keep sending those judicious, civil posts. It's
refreshing to see that there are individuals on this list who not only
use operating systems other than DOS-Windows, but try to take a larger
view of the direction in which computers are likely to be going.
On Tue, 16 Apr 1996 03:11:03 -0400 Jack Shafer wrote:
>
>
>Harmon,
>
>The beauty of language resides it is in redundancy, but really, Harmon,
>aren't you overdoing it? Can't you keep your mouth shut when you have nothing
>new to say? Windoze...OS/2...Linux...your meditations clog my monitor like so
>much sticky arrowroot. Take all that time you waste here responding to every
>burp and fart and instead create some brilliant XPL. Write cleverly like
>Holmgren. Offer knockout XyWrite suggestions like Leslie. Ponder tough
>Xyproblems like Annie. Or, for Christsake, think twice before punching the
>send button.
>
>Yours in disgust,
>
>Jack Shafer
>
Rafe T.
Readme @http://www.quicklink.com/~rtenn