[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: Dos Box creepers and more
- Subject: Re: Dos Box creepers and more
- From: "J. R. Fox" jr_fox@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 13:38:08 -0800
Fredric Gross wrote:
> The DOS virtual drives are C:, D:,
> E: & F:.
I hope this does not come across as overly pedantic, but several of us have been
chided before in this forum over vague or imprecise terminology. To me,
"virtual drive" means a RAMdisk, which, insofar as I know, has not been an
option in the Win world post W-98. I think that these are all "real" drives,
albeit some of them logical drives, however the drive-lettering scheme may be
processed by different OSes.
> The W95 virtual drive is beyond the ken of DOS.
That would be because Win of that vintage used FAT-32 partitions as a default,
which DOS can't see without a special driver. There are other reasons DOS can't
see some drives, such as partitions that extend out beyond either the 8Gig mark
or cross a 1024 cylinder boundary.
> However, when in W95, the W95 virtual drive identifies itself as C:,
So it must be a Primary (physical) partition, possibly an alternate C:.
> and renames the DOS C: drive as G:.
That's the part that confuses me. Maybe something to do with your boot manager
utility.
> when running W95, I am able to read from and write to each of my DOS virtual
> drives.
As long as you can do that, you're in business.
Jordan