[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
RE: A very basic printing question re XY3
- Subject: RE: A very basic printing question re XY3
- From: Harry Binswanger hb@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:56:48 -0500
Altruism isn't
religious, it's built-in (well...built-into some
people).
Religion just takes advantage our good
nature.
(and our need to celebrate the winter
solstice...btw)
I think religion takes advantage of the evil (irrational) in some
people's nature. If altruism isn't based on religion, what is it based
on? I've been unable to find *argument* (good or bad) for altruism in the
history of philosophy. It's just taken as self-evident (because of the
influence of religion). It's hard to think of what *could* be an argument
for "non-you" as the standard of morality.
"Why is it moral to serve the happiness of others, but not your own?
If enjoyment is a value, why is it moral when experienced by others, but
immoral when experienced by you? If the sensation of eating a cake is a
value, why is it an immoral indulgence in your stomach, but a moral goal
for you to achieve in the stomach of others?" (Atlas Shrugged, p.
1031)
-BrianH.
-----Original
Message-----
From: Harry Binswanger
Good for Jobs! I guess he learned from the
parable of his namesake that there's no point in buying into the ethics
of He Who Toys With Us.
Harry Binswanger
hb@xxxxxxxx
Harry Binswanger
hb@xxxxxxxx