[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: footnote superscripts
- Subject: Re: footnote superscripts
- From: "Paul Breeze" dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxx (Redacted sender "paul.breeze" for DMARC)
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 18:44:31 +0100
Dear Carl
Yes, that would work, wouldn't it. The only problem is that I will have
to give up one of my existing styles to achieve it. But hang on ..
Looking at the colour table again I do see what Harry was driving at.
There are bold, italic and underlined superscripts and subscripts. The
trouble is, they are all of the same colour combination. The whole
point of changing the footnote superscript would be to make it stand out
so that footnotes could easily be picked out in the text. To do that, I
need them to be a different colour. Ah, well.
Paul
On 12/08/2016 18:23, Carl Distefano wrote:
Reply to note from "Paul Breeze"
(Redacted sender "paul.breeze" for DMARC) Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:09:32
+0100
I *think* what Harry may be suggesting is to keep MD SU for footnote
superscripts and use a different MoDe for regular superscripts. This is
actually a good idea; you just have to remember to embed (or
whatever MoDe you choose) for regular superscripts.