[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: Robert -- Re: OT: End Note ?
- Subject: Re: Robert -- Re: OT: End Note ?
- From: David Auerbach auerbach@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:08:01 -0400
I'm sure you know that there is Google scholar which is very nice.
Doesn't get you the full text but does get you the citations. Of
course, if I log onto it through my NCSU library gateway it knows who
I am and I *do* get full-text access to QAB (quite a bit).
And, the NCSU library has a nice remote citation service that can
feed me what a endnote would. As it happens I use Bookends on my Mac,
which is well-designed (uh, bookends, not the Mac (although the Mac
is well-designed too (but that wasn't my point)))
On Aug 30, at 6:40 AM, Robert Holmgren wrote:
** Reply to message from "Patricia M. Godfrey"
on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:44:41 -0400
And I have the manual for Ibid for Xy.
I do too. Probably looked at it once, 17 years ago, and shoved
it back on the shelf. From Flash's description of a program
with lots of bells and whistles, this sounds like a much more
sophisticated undertaking than I imagined. NBWin has a new
Archiva (I think it's called) add-on for US$100, which does web
research -- NB is obviously the way to go for this. Filling out
the Ibidem template and adding keywords strikes me as a lot of
work. Frankly, for basic citation, I don't see much
value-added. You keep a master bibliography, and just
cut-and-paste! You have to look up page numbers manually
anyway, and inserting an op.cit is not exactly difficult. The
rest is single-keystroke boilerplate.
Another problem with web research tools is that you need
authentication to access the good ones. All the quality
databases require an institutional affiliation -- no way that I
know of to get into Factiva, or Wilson, or LexNex except using
a university proxy server (anybody know of free, legit
access??). So if you're an academic -- spot on, you're in. But
if not, you might as well just Google it. For the sort of work I
do, mostly with old source material, Google is as good (or bad)
as any other tool.
--
Robert Holmgren
robert.holmgren@xxxxxxxx
holmgren@xxxxxxxx
David Auerbach
Department of Philosophy & Religion
Box 8103
NCSU
Raleigh, NC 27695-8103