[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: U2 glitches
- Subject: Re: U2 glitches
- From: Robert Holmgren holmgren@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 08:56:39 EST
** Reply to note from xywrite@xxxxxxxx Sat, 17 Jun 2000 05:02:46 +0000
> So the problem is the presence in XYWWWEB.INF of , where xx is any
> function assigned to key #104? If so, then the solution seems simple:
> delete each offending . (SEarch for them in eXPanded view.)
You mean, delete *if* (only if) "xx" is assigned to 104 in KBD.
Don't delete *all* the s in INF, though -- that would defeat the
purpose. Another solution would be to remove, from key 104, assignments other
than or non-functions. For example, you could probably put a soft-
on 104 without any problem.
---------
Robert Holmgren
holmgren@xxxxxxxx
---------