[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][ Date Index][ Subject Index]

Re: New York Times is at it Again



> Maybe *you* can figure out what the Times is "at" again.
> Darned if I can. ... Ciao.   --a
>

When I saw the headline about Shakespeare's having never lost a word to
a computer crash, all I could think of was but he might have lost it to
any number of other factors, such as (but not limited to) fire,
accidentally tossing a page aside, and ink spills from quill failure.

Therefore, I did not read the article, nor am I tempted to do so now.

--
Leslie Bialler
Columbia University Press
lb136@xxxxxxxx
> http://www.columbia.edu/cu/cup