[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: Another "Formatted View" bug?
- Subject: Re: Another "Formatted View" bug?
- From: "..." adpf@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 17:51:49 -0500 (EST)
≪ I get a switch to page-line view regularly when I save a file
containing tables or, if memory serves, graphics. ≫
≪ Of course. Because there's no way to display tables or graphics
with Wrap_to_Fit (VAriable WF) turned on (=1, which is the way everybody
has Xy set up). It's a feature. ≫
The logic that you find so compelling, Robert, escapes me. XyDos has
specific ways to alter the view if wanted. Why should a save "of course"
do it too--the user's wishes be damned? If not a bug, it's one more
instance of v4 trying to outthink the user and failing unproductively and
intrusively.
≪ I suspect that more than a few of the complaints we're reading
here about Xy4 reflect a dogged persistence of III+ habits that are
obsolete in Xy4. ≫
Expecting the display to stay in the view the user designates == dogged
persistence of an obsolete habit?
≪ It takes some digging sometimes, but I've found solutions to
every significant Xy4 "problem" I ever (thought that I had) encountered. ≫
But not everyone wants to work almost exclusively in expanded view.
≪ I have to laugh when I read about the lack of documentation for
Xy4 XPL! Xy3's XPL was well documented, I suppose? ≫
Tech notes and responsive tech support compensated for XyQuest's sins of
omission, and one user wrote a book that must have embarrassed XyQuest
profoundly for its sin of commission. But xyW 4 has no counterpart even
for that $30 xpl pamphlet xyQ published.
≪ I'm sure Ken Frank is cheered by the die-hard loyalty to III+
manifest here. ≫
Nobody sent money to TTG and installed v4 expecting to continue using v3.
Credit for any die-hard loyalty to v3 goes to use of Signature and xyW 4.
≪ It suggests that these users have stepped defiantly off the
upgrade bus, & will not be purchasing new product anytime soon. ≫
What have XyDos 3 vs. 4 issues to do with a new gui product? I need a
Windows word processor, I need text db software, and I have no exotic OS
anxiety. If xy32 is free of xyWin bugs, I have every reason to upgrade.
XyDos 4 notwithstanding, twpfkaxw can be expected to be more xyW3-compatible
than winWord or winWP.
≪ Frank can safely ignore them. As he does anyway. ≫
Are you suggesting that *anything* posted here influences TTG? ... Ciao. --a
============================= adpFisher nyc