[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: Is XY-Write a word-processor or a text editor?
- Subject: Re: Is XY-Write a word-processor or a text editor?
- From: yesss@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 00:46:19 -0500 (EST)
I hope that everyone agrees by now that the answer
to the question the subject asks is yes. ...
XyWrite 3.52 was the best, but
I use 3.56 because it has the British
spelling dictionary. It won't do
automatic text replace, though. --Steve Hayes
I used v3.52 for years and am *very* curious
to know precisely what makes you condider that
release superior to 3.56.
Disagree. The fabled 3.55 was the best
of 3-series. The AR function was killed
*after* that, although their were some
user-hacks to get around this. --Jordan Fox
I never used v3.55, but I understand that that
was the release that introduced the single most
important xpl advance ever, string parsing.
A perplexingly big deal has been made of the
crippled autoreplace in releases after v3.55.
As has been noted on this list again and again:
Autoreplace in later xyW3 works transparently
with simple, one-time user intervention. Just
prefix AR to five custom kbd entries:
57=AR,[space]
28=AR,[ascii 13 (carriage return)]
12=AR,-
40=AR,'
53=AR,/
--hyphen, apostrophe, and slash because they may
occur within what xyW3.56 and later consider to
be a word. If--like xyW4--the releases of v3 that
autoreplace without kbd edits treat the chars
on each side of a hyphen as a separate word, then
the later v3 releases are superior to v3.55. ... Ciao. --a
======================================= adpFisher nyc
xyWrite 3 supplements !xyWise and !xyWiz +
Wolfgang Bechstein's seafaring adventures:
http://www.escape.com/~yesss/ ========================================