[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: XyWin vs. WPWin
- Subject: Re: XyWin vs. WPWin
- From: ROB RITTENHOUSE RRITTENHOUSE@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1995 10:03:59 -0600 (CST)
>Subj: Re: XyWin vs. WPWin
>I can't believe that there is a v. 6.2 of WPWin. I got an early
>upgrade of v. 6.1 at the end of November. If Allan saw it, it must
>exist, but how often does Novell expect people to upgrade? V. 6.0a
>was also a 1994 version, probably the first usable version of 6.
>
>--
>Nathan Sivin
>History and Sociology of Science
>University of Pennsylvania
>Philadelphia PA 19104-3325
It's v 6.1. I'd give you load comparison times for it vs Notabene
DOS on an 8M 386 25 but I'd have to turn the hourglass too many
times when timing WP Win.
=================================================================
=======
Rob Rittenhouse RRITTENHOUSE@xxxxxxxx * Your new machines may simply
Associate Professor Computer Science * suggest new drudgeries.
McMurry University Abilene TX 79697-0686 * Brecht, Galileo