[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: spell checker
- Subject: Re: spell checker
- From: Daniel Say say@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 23:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
" Reply to note from pjd Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:07:09
" -> ----------
" -> Solution 1:
" -> ----------
" -> use the personal dictionary to flag properly spelled
" -> words using the special XyWrite flag "?"
" ->
" -> ;SP;
" -> color ?
" -> colour ?
" ->
" -> this means that BOTH are shown as incorrect and I can
" -> make a decision at the time
"
" Hey, that's neat! I'd never heard of that....
" --
" Carl Distefano " cld@xxxxxxxx " http://users.datarealm.com/xywwweb/
I've used that for some time to
remind me to check "its" for antecedents.
It only beeps, but that is often enough
to remind to check the reference.
In Autocorrect, you could load just the
PERS.spl or whatever you are calling
it to run against the text, and in the
limited PERS.spl, have only the vocabulary
you want.
So you have a PERS.SPL with
labor labour and
color colour in it
and then when you type labor it does
the autoreplace.
Myself, for projects, I'll run the default
spellchecker against a typical text and use
the resultant exception file as part of the
PROJ1.spl for correcting or auto-correcting
that document.
unwantedword gobbledegook
is another option to flag "bad" words.
Some titles are entered as abbreviations
and then automatically substituted in bold
by putting the guillemets around the
expanding title with the format and full title.
Daniel Say
say@xxxxxxxx