[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: Stack glitch
- Subject: Re: Stack glitch
- From: "R Tennenbaum" rtenn@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 97 12:06:42 -0400
I am sending you a copy of this message in part because one I sent to
the list last night has not been posted and I do not know why.
No one is sorrier than I that ADPF or whatever her name is gave me a
nice red herring instead of a bit of advice, but I don't see as how
that should grant her license to insult me, or anyone else license to
block my posts. I am sorry if she is jealous of her precious PS
secrets, but ah, I only asked for a little one, not a whole damned
ashow routine.
Of course the general (or particular) concensus may be she's more
useful and deserving than I.
RT
===========================
>symptom of some sort of conflict, or needn't I worry about it?
>
>It is normal behavior. I quote STACK.DOC:
>
>-------CUT-------
>Note that Stack traps and EXits when it receives from the KeyBoarD any of
>the following functions as the *first* characters in a key definition:
> BN BX H@ HF HL JH JM OP SH VH
>Untrapped, these funcs would cause Stack to crash. In normal operation,
>Stack PRoMPTs "Hit key again" in response (requests you to issue the
>trapped keystroke a second time).
Uh huh. I did RTFM. I don't get that prompt, okay? And when I ask
about potentially worrisome conflicts, I am also polling other users
here about ones they may have observed. Not much different than
saying,
"I'm thinking of using OS/2 2.0, anyone having any problems?"
> You can avoid this benign annoyance by
Starting to sound like a good idea... I don't much like being
insulted by Ms. Fisher apparently because she gave *me* a misleading
reply.
RT