[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: NR (no ruler)
- Subject: Re: NR (no ruler)
- From: Carl Distefano cld@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:35:03 -0500
Reply to note from Harry Binswanger Sat, 02 Feb
2008 15:23:39 -0800
> So, just to see if I have this straight: you can avoid a
> subroutine by putting executable code into a S/G and then
> "putting" it as often as you like (if you don't change the
> contents of the S/G, of course). And if there's no
> concatenation required, one would use instead of
> ?
Yes! By George, you've got it!
--
Carl Distefano
cld@xxxxxxxx