[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Macs and Xy
- Subject: Macs and Xy
- From: "Alan Lothian" alanl@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 98 22:45:47 +0100
I've been following the discussion on Macs, Virtual PC and
Xywrite with some interest.
In London publishing, Macs rule the roost: probably
about 90%, perhaps more. In illustrated publishing,
certainly more. We use high-end PCs for digital
illustration (the CAD heritage showing through)
and Macs with Quark and Illustrator/Photoshop
for everything else.
Doesn't bother me, much. I *like* my office G3,
though it isn't perfect by any means.
However, there's a serious lack of text processing
tools for the Mac. I make my trainee writers use BBEdit,
which isn't bad (what with grepping and all, it's almost
a graphic Xywrite, though for writing purposes that's pretty
irrelevant) but many companies have got into the habit of
using Quark for casual office wordprocessing. (They really
have. I am not making this up. Smallish companies with
n licences... it even makes sense, if all your people have to
be Quark-literate anyway, and all you need for office
wordprocessing is a few letters. Beats a typewriter, and
you've already bought it. And I share the group's opinion
of Word.)
If I can have Xy as a power tool on a Mac, as seems to
be the developing consensus here, then I can feel
my tail start to wag.
And I like the idea of the ultimate graphics machine
and the ultimate text software striding into the sunlit
uplands of Y2K.
--
Alan Lothian
alanl@xxxxxxxx