[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: OSes [utterly Xy-irrelevant]
- Subject: Re: OSes [utterly Xy-irrelevant]
- From: jr_fox@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:33:49 -0800
Peter Evans wrote:
> Perhaps I misread Jordan Fox's message, but I think he was saying that
> it would be easy to add Linux and more Windozes to a system already
> boasting four independent OSes. I didn't, and don't, think that this is
> so. There is no one simple, soundbyte-expressible, limit, but there is a
> limit of four partitions per hard drive, and this limit is likely to
> prove a hurdle (or worse).
No, not easy. This stuff is NEVER easy. It needs careful prep and some
understanding. The choices one has already made affect future options. I
had 3 OSes (more, if you count multiple versions of the same ones, for
Maintenance and other purposes) on one hard drive. Things became more
complicated -- but also easier in certain respects -- after I added the 2nd.
hard drive.
Jordan
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Peter "minimal quoting" Evans, wondering
> whether it's right to post egregiously
> Xy-irrelevant messages to this list, but
> anyway trying to be concise about it;
I wouldn't sweat it: this is neither egregious nor (usually) a high-traffic
venue.