Re: SL command

[Judith Davidsen jdavidsen@xxxxxxxx]

Carl--

This appeals tremendously. In fact, it's vaguely
familiar--maybe this is the way SL originally worked for me.

Judith Davidsen

> On yet another hand
> (and in combination either of the other two hands), it
> could be designed more cautiously to pause at each open
> window and ask for user confirmation before saving the
> file. If any of these hands beckons, let me know and
> I'll try my hand at implementing them. Could come in,
> uh, handy.
>
> --
> Carl Distefano
> cld@xxxxxxxx
> http://users.datarealm.com/xywwweb/
>
> > > > SL worked for me with my old laptop, where I used Xy4.014Dos
> > > > out of the box in a Dos window, but using Xy4.018Dos in a Win
> > > > window on my Dell Inspiron 3200, SL doesn't work.
> > > >
> > Carl Distefano wrote:
> >
> > > ....... Though I
> > > see its potential uses, the idea of blindly SAving or SToring files
> > > not visible in the current window has never appealed to me.
> > >
> > Hmmm. I liked SL because I frequently have something in all
> > 9 XyDos windows, and given the glitchiness of Win and
> > Win-related products, I sometimes have to go on rebooting
> > binges, which means manually closing out Xy each time. But I
> > don't want to STore directories, do I, or--gulp--U2? I'm
> > gonna have to give this a little thought. Thanks for the
> > quibble.
> >
> > Judith Davidsen
> >