In the humble view of this East Coaster, there is much to be
said for burning the whole LA area (or at least Orange County) every two
years. Allowing that doing so could induce a mean smog during a
temperature inversion, two weeks of smog every two years strikes me
as far preferable to more than 50 weeks of smog every
year.
Fred
----- Original Message -----
Subject: Re: off topic: different
cultures, same ideas
I've a stock response
when someone suggests that the Los Angeles area would benefit from using
past Indian "wisdom" to manage the local environment: "Oh
goody! We're going to set fire to Orange County every other
year!"
(For the curious-- Range fires tend to burn off smaller twigs
and branches on shrubs, but leave them alive, so the following
spring you get a lot of new buds and young green branches. These tend
to be high in sugar-rich sap, which attracts deer and other
browsing animals, which simplifies hunting deer... So every so often
local Indians did set fire to the flat lands in the LA area. And then
of course, thermal inversions trapped the smoke in the LA
basin, creating smog centuries before cars were
invented.)
----Original Message Follows---- From: George
Scithers
mailto:owlswick@xxxxxxxxowlswick@xxxxxxxx Reply-To:
Subject:
Re: off topic: different cultures, same ideas Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002
21:49:21 -0400
It would be satisfying to refute the goody-goody image
of the environmentally sensitive Amerindians . . .
George Scithers
of
mailto:owlswickpress@xxxxxxxxowlswickpress@xxxxxxxx -----
Original Message ----- From:
mailto:PhilA77808@xxxxxxxxPhilA77808@xxxxxxxx To:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
|