[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: BC XC or BX Q2
- Subject: Re: BC XC or BX Q2
- From: Jane Van Tassel 101233.342@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:02:35 -0400
{..} = function call, not alphanumeric string
[a] {BX}se .word.{Q2} works, of course.
[b] {BX}se .{WA}.{Q2} also works, in the literal sense that it finds the
function-call string "{WA}"; but it won't find what the wildcard call
represents, i.e. any alphabetic character.
However, BX-Q2 _can_ be used to (as in the above example) find the next
alphabetic character, thus:
[c] {BX}(se .{A}.){Q2}
This differs from [b] above in two ways:
(1) Instead of function call {WA}, use wildcard {A}, either by
inputting it from the command line -- {BC}pfunc a{XC} -- or else (though
some of our best minds eschew the ScrollLock) by keying ScrLk Alt+Shft+A
(at least, Alt+Shft+A is how you input the alphabetic wildcard in the Xy
default KBD file; mutatis mutandis, if you've been tinkering with your KBD
file).
(2) Enclose the entire routine inside parentheses, thus: {BX}(se
...{A}.){Q2} works, {BX}se .{A}.{Q2} doesn't.
Cheers
Eric Van Tassel
e-mail: EricVT@xxxxxxxx
Archways, Butts Lane, Fowlmere
near Royston, Herts. SG8 7SL
England