[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][ Date Index][ Subject Index]

Re: Xywrite antiques



Welcome to the club ... WE SURE ARE DIE-HARDS!
Dick Giering

Jay McNally wrote:

> I just got on this site today, and the two posts I've seen already suggest
> you guys are die-hard XyWriters (or whatever we're called).
>
> I've used XyWrite for 15 yrs, since 1986, and am the only guy in my
> Microsoft-based newspaper using it.
>
> Can't imagine giving it up.
>
> So, howdy folks!
>
> At 04:50 PM 7/19/01 -0800, you wrote:
> >yesss@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > . xyWrite users prize above all else software
> > > we ourselves can bend to our diverse needs.
> >
> >Quite so.
> >
> > > To presume that a product with a hard-coded keyboard,
> > > e.g., would "provide what many of you are looking for"
> > > reveals a basic misperception and proves that--when
> > > what we already have meets basic needs and is so
> > > user-configurable to meet new ones--we are rightly
> > > skeptical about new-software promises. The offer
> > > of a "free xyWrite keyboard" gave a hint of
> > > reduced flexibility, but I couldn't have imagined
> > > an apparently binary-mapped xyWrite-family kbd.
> >
> >We're in agreement here. No way am I prepared to re-map my extensively
> >mapped keyboard, which has been that way for so very long. Having .SGTs or
> >XPL routines or Help Frames that no longer work would be a large drawback as
> >well.
> >
> > > ≪ Well, I do have to admit that NB is a Windows program. ≫
> >
> >This ranks as a big problem for me. The Command Line is reduced to a small
> >supporting role in XyWin. I'm not familiar with NB, but doubt it has the
> >flexibility to mimic the look and feel of Xy4DOS. Absent that I think I'll
> >stand pat.
> >
> > > I salute NB for that, and I'd like to further support
> > > development. If NB ever develops an interest in knowing
> > > what *xyWrite* users think would constitute the world's
> > > best word processor and responds accordingly, I'll be
> > > first in line to try it. Till then, when I want to use
> > > a Windows word processor I'll load xyWin, the most
> > > unfairly bad-mouthed app I know (all too often
> > > by people who never used it). ...
> >
> >Maybe so, maybe so. I tried it, could not seem to mold it to my
> >preferences, or at least to my tolerances, so I shelved it. No surprise --
> >it looks and feels like a Windows program. And I guess that ruins it for
> >me.
> >
> >Jordan