[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][Date Index][Subject Index]

Re: Reverse engineering - confirmed for version 3!



Hi John,
Thank you for your email— 
As you said, I’m very interested in locating additional versions of editor.exe, full installation disks, and any related materials that people would be willing to share for the project. Your mention of having a large.
Below is the list of versions I’m still trying to track down. It’s based on my own research, so there may be minor errors, but most should be accurate. I’m interested in standalone editor copies or, ideally, complete disks — including minor updates and subversions
NABS Foundation
v1.0 / 1.1
v2.0 / 2.1
XyWrite III
v3.0
v3.05
v3.06
v3.1 / 3.11
v3.12
v3.15
XyWrite III Plus
v3.50
v3.51
v3.52c
v3.52m
v3.52r
v3.53
v3.54a
v3.54b
v3.55a
v3.55b4
v3.57A / 3.57B / 3.57C / 3.57D
v3.58
Coyote (Internal Beta)
v3.90–3.96
IBM Signature (Project J)
v1.01–1.03
v1.04
v1.05
XyWrite 4 (XyQuest Return)
v4.0
v4.01
v4.010
v4.011
v4.012
v4.013
v4.014A
v4.014L
v4.015
v4.015-B
v4.015-B2
v4.015-C
v4.015L
v4.015Q
v4.015-O
v4.016
v4.016A–D
v4.017E
v4.017-X
XyWrite for Windows (XyWin)
v1.0
v4.11
v4.11a
v4.12j
If you happen to have any of these — or know someone who might — I would really appreciate hearing from you.
Best regards,
XYGHOST



From: xywrite-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <xywrite-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of John Paines <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2026 3:55 PM
To: xywrite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <xywrite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Reverse engineering - confirmed for version 3!
 
Could well be unnecessary at this point, but I remain a daily Xywrite III user, and have a large archive available to test -- long documents, complex formatting, lots of xpl programming, etc.

xyghost has inquired into versions.  For this user, the one of choice is 3.55 because that's the last one which retained the "expandable" spelling feature -- a user-created and editable dictionary file which expands single letter (plus space) into a word or lawsuit.  


On Sunday, March 1, 2026 at 08:56:17 AM EST, Edward Mendelson <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


And, yes, following Kari's and xyghost's advice, I now have the
newly-compiled 3.5 version working exactly as it should work.
Brilliantly well done, xyghost. This was simply unimaginable until now,
and it's clearly working as designed.