[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][Date Index][Subject Index]

Re: XYWRITE 4.018 Source Code | request for resources



Harry I agree. Many many years ago, we tried to discern on this list if xywrite was abandonware, and we determined that it was. Anybody with an interest in disputing that was contacted and did not respond. Years have passed. It truly is abandonware. There is not the least legal question of that. 


On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 at 17:40, Harry Binswanger <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not a lawyer, but 40 years ago I dated one while she was in law
school, so my opinion carries a lot of weight. Xy is abandonware. We
can take "adverse possession" and after a time we will own it. Now,
NB is not in that category. It's code is very much theirs.

Carl, I believe you have even better legal training than I.

Regards,
Harry Binswanger

At 01:20 PM 4/7/2026, you wrote:
>>
>>and will keep pushing ahead. I may extend the work further, but so
>>far I&rsquom honestly disappointed by the limited response and lack
>>of resources, information, etc. I requested.
>
>and not accusatory annoyance.
>
>
>knowledge to pitch it at Xyghost&rsquos level. I can&rsquot begin to
>understand most of what s/he reports.
>
>
>on a non-standard Hyperion computer in 1983(?).  If any of us are
>programming these days, it is probably with a relatively high level program.
>
>
>around. I can only cheer from the sidelines.
>
>
>issue unless the modified code were used for economic benefit. If I
>paid for Xy 4.x, and someone produces an improved version, whoever
>holds the copyright is not being economically impacted by my use of
>the modified version.
>
>
>to market a Xy 5.x, but after all these years this seems unlikely.
>
>Myron (Gochnauer)
>