Re: New Enter routine

[Harry Binswanger hb@xxxxxxxx]

Carl,
There is no "Stack" or "non-Stack" version. There is a single version that
stacks commands if and only if Stack is installed


I was referring to this:
"Whoops! Inadvertently omitted the code to Stack commands. Apologies."
which I interpreted (incorrectly?) as meaning that version omitted code
pertaining to Stack.
> Second, re the speller, what if the ENTER key has keyboard programming
> along the lines I suggested (but with XMACRO facility):
>
> 28=NO==0>!==1>!==1>{13}$X
This is pure nonsense. Please READ my earlier messages. What part of "The
spell-checker expects a single  from the Enter key; if it does not get
it, IT DOES NOT RESPOND! ... You need a standard Enter key" do you NOT
understand?
I read all your earlier messages. There is some part of the above that I
apparently do NOT understand. Wouldn't the key assignment (if it can be
made to work) precisely do what you say is required: send what the
spell-checker expects: "a single  from the Enter key." The code there
tests for whether the spell-checker has highlighted a word, if it has, then
it sends a single , which I indicated by {13}, to the spell-checker.

What we have here is a failure to communicate.



Harry Binswanger
hb@xxxxxxxx