[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][ Date Index][ Subject Index]

Re: BigCI

Reply to note from Carl Distefano  Sat, 18 Dec 2010
23:03:31 -0500

> SE/F is flawed

Actually, as I think more about it, that's not true. If SE/F counted
the string under the cursor as a hit, the cursor wouldn't advance to
the next occurrence of the string when the command is issued
repeatedly. You'd be stuck.

So, the design of SE/F is sound. It's just not the right tool for
the job (in BigCI*).

BTW, I renamed that routine to LCI* when I last updated the code.
Check the archives.

--
Carl Distefano
cld@xxxxxxxx