[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re: Logon
- Subject: Re: Logon
- From: Leslie Bialler lb136@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:54:31 -0500
Carl Distefano wrote:
> You don't need "log.log". (Never heard of it, don't
> where it comes from -- is it in the default
> installation?)
Yep.
> If you log on as "jim", all you need is
> "jim.log".
>
Noted! Thanks.
>
> It just occurred to me that the idea behind making the
> LOGON command RUN the .LOG files like XPL programs must
> have been that these .LOG files were supposed to be
> vehicles for loading different configurations
> for different users.
Probably so!
> . . . . I never heard of the
> LOGON command actually being used that way, but it
> certainly would be a viable and convenient use for it,
> even in a non-network setting.
It sure would.
--
Leslie Bialler, Columbia University Press
lb136@xxxxxxxx
New Address:
61 W. 62 St, NYC 10023
212-459-0600 X7109 (phone) 212-459-3677 (fax)
> http://www.columbia.edu/cu/cup