[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][ Date Index][ Subject Index]

Re: Xywrite antiques



Just to add a note of agreement.
                David

At 09:29 AM 5/9/01 -0400, you wrote:
> Myron asks: > Any opinions on how copyright should be treated for > the collecting and historical study of old computer programs??? It seems > plausible that someone might want to collect all versions of something > like XyWrite or Word Perfect. Aside from the intrinsic interest, there > might be historical concerns as well: I couldn't agree more. It seems to me this is something Congress needs to address. Ideally, or so it seems to me, once a particular version of a software product is no longer offered for sale--due either to upgrading or obsolescence--free distribution ought to be permitted after a certain period of time--say, seven years. Just imagine. If this law were in effect, free versions of Windows 3.1 could now be distributed (although why anyone would want one I cannot imagine). > Are there coding differences that > can be correlated to social, economic or enterprise events? I would love > to see a PhD thesis on the impact of the Microsoft/WordPerfect > competition on wordprocessing features, coding, performance, marketplace > expectation, etc. Indeed! So would I. > Why, for example, did Word Perfect go from the elegant > version 4.2 to increasing bloated, slow, buggy versions 5.0--->9? or is > it now 10? Because that which was once designed for a specific purpose--and did it well--was bloated into something that attempted to do all things for all people--and did them all badly. (One wonders, for example, how much code has gone into the creation of the odious Paperclip and how much system resources it takes up!) > Computer programs are, after all, social "artifacts" that > reflect the cultures that create them. What does the dominance and > nature of Microsoft word tell us about US society? How would > wordprocessors differ if some other country were the dominant player in > the market? Japanese, German, British... Or if women dominated software > design and programming? aaahhh... enough already. I just finished > marking final exams (law -- evidence) and I'm a bit punchy. Not at all. A very provocative post, Myron! Thank you. -- Leslie Bialler, Columbia University Press lb136@xxxxxxxx 61 W. 62 St, NYC 10023 212-459-0600 X7109 (phone) 212-459-3677 (fax) > http://www.columbia.edu/cu/cup
David B. Kronenfeld Phone Office 909/787-4340 Department of Anthropology Message 909/787-5524 University of California Fax 909/787-5409 Riverside, CA 92521 email kfeld@xxxxxxxx http://www.ucr.edu/CHSS/depts/anthro/home.htm http://pweb.netcom.com/~fanti/david.html