Re: Correction:BC vs. BX (was: XyWin sounds)

["Carl L. Distefano" CLDistefano@xxxxxxxx]

** Reply to note from Robert Holmgren  Fri, 24 Jan 97 02:58:26 +0000
> 
> Well, BX won't work if the command you're issuing needs an argument -- unless
> you've taken care to provide some alternative method of passing an argument, or
> of loading S/G 00 up with the argument (a main role of S/G 00 is to read and
> contain arguments).

Robert: BX has always accepted native commands+arguments: BX lm 15diQ2 
As opposed to JM/JH, which, of course, can't process, e.g.,
JM 2.framename argQ2. What situation did you have in mind?


--------------
Carl Distefano * * * CLDistefano@xxxxxxxx
--------------