Re: XPL questions

[Harry Binswanger hb@xxxxxxxx]

Robert wrote:
The two bytes is key. SEarch for {not}{cr} by itself, and it jumps two bytes.

Son of a gun!
> I've found a number of times when I try to use a CI /// with both
> wildcards (especially the wild-W) and a carriage return or two that I
get a
> spurious error message about wildcards having to be in the same order in
> the search and replace.

Example? (ENCODE it -- let's see the XPL, and also sample text that you want
to CI...)
Well, in trying to set up a sample, I may have found the problem--which, if
it is the problem, is in my XyBasic to XPL translator. Looks like the
translator is, unaccountably, putting string variables onto the CM-line in
the form  instead of . I need to do more investigating to see if
this is always the case.
At any rate, I take it that you and Carl haven't run up against wildcard
limits?

Regards,
HB




Harry Binswanger
hb@xxxxxxxx