[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][ Date Index][ Subject Index]

RE: OT: "literally"



Peter Cook references are always appreciated.

Regards,

Paul Ambos
pambos@xxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xywrite@xxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xywrite@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Auerbach
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 7:06 PM
To: xywrite@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OT: "literally"

On Jun 9, at 6:28 PM, Patricia M. Godfrey wrote:

> David Auerbach wrote:
>> though litosis is not an entirely undesirable device.
>
> Was that a deliberate--and witty, with its echo of disease
> conditions--coinage or a just a typo? When I studied rhetoric, it
> was litotes.

Half-and-half? I was tired, couldn't quite remember the noun
(litotis? litotes?) thought of using litotic. Then said, screw it,
I'll go for inflammation of the litotes (along with the immediately
following example of perfectly good litotes.)
  But you know, I didn't have enough Latin for the judgin'.


David Auerbach
Department of Philosophy & Religion
Box 8103	
Raleigh, NC 27695-8103                  http://
slowfoodusa.org
auerbach@xxxxxxxx                  http://
slowfoodtriangle.org