[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][ Date Index][ Subject Index]

Re: OT: W98-related question



Jordan,
Any problem with freecell is a class-A emergency in my book intended--I play it daily to unwind>.
I don't recall freecell being actually full screen on Win 98--just that you
could make the window larger (as with all Windows windows). Are you sure
it's not a screen resolution issue? Maybe your newer system has a higher
screen res than your W98 one, and the smaller size that results is causing
your discomfort.

If it helps, my CARDS.DLL is dated 8/04/04 and is 359936 bytes.
--Harry
I'm posting this here because I know that (at least)
Patricia still uses W98, and there are likely others
here who do also. I recalled that the FreeCell game
in W98 could be run at full-screen size, whereas the
later versions in W2K or XP cannot. (The maximum is a
vertical half-size . . . unless there is some Registry
hack for this.) So I took the trouble to extract the
W98 version game from an old hard drive. It would not
run at all in the later Win, giving an error message
about a library file needed, and what I took to be a
16-bit / 32-bit incompatibility.

Some searching on the web turned up a message
indicating that the missing library file was an
earlier version of Cards.DLL. I copied that over to
the FreeCell-98 directory I had established. Now the
earlier version seems to load -- or does it ? "Help |
About" yields the same version #, and the display size
continues to be limited. At first, I thought the
later .DLL was pre-empting, no matter what. But most
likely the newer version of FreeCell is what continues
to run.

I wouldn't waste the space here, but the question does
have implications for running *other* older 16-bit
Windows items. In a case like this, how do you match
up support files and *force* the older stuff to run ?
I gather there may be some other subsystem emulators
akin to DOSBOX that can handle this task.


Jordan


Harry Binswanger
hb@xxxxxxxx