Re: Wikipedia entry on XyWrite

[Harry Binswanger hb@xxxxxxxx]

I really would like someone with more knowledge than I to look at the
Wikipedia entry. I've made some more changes, including factual details
that I am not certain are correct.

E.g., is this (which I didn't edit) correct:
"Thanks in large part to the work of users of XyWrite, the program is still
very usable with Windows (or MS-DOS, and thus Linux{ Even on Pentium and
similar hardware, it remains noticeably faster than Microsoft Word or
OpenOffice. Despite these advantages in speed, XyWrite does not have as
many features as Word or Open Office. For example, XyWrite is unaware of
Windows ANSI or Unicode character sets and Nota Bene does not support
languages (such as Chinese) that require double-byte characters."

Harry Binswanger
hb@xxxxxxxx