[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
RE: Military time (whoops!)
- Subject: RE: Military time (whoops!)
- From: "Brian Henderson" brian-henderson@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:22:40 -0700
I think where I said "seconds", I meant "minutes"...I think. I can't be too
sure where numbers are involved.
B.H.
> OK, where's the reality here?
>
> If12 midnight belongs to the finishing day, then I would think 24:00
> would be appropriate, and the next second would be 00:01. Only if
> midnight is considered to be the beginning of the day does it
> make sense for it to be 00:00.
>
> Now, the above statements are only arguing for the semantic logic
> of naming. Does it make sense, as to the number of seconds
> accounted for within a 24 hour period? Does 00:01 thru 24:00
> equal the correct number of seconds?
>
> Is there any "official" determination about which day midnight belongs to?
>
> -BrianH.
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/366 - Release Date: 6/15/2006
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/366 - Release Date: 6/15/2006