[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][Date Index][Subject Index]

Re: As long as everyone else is doing it...



> >I'm sure. But I don't have Xy/Win.
> >When I was using OS/2 instead of Win95, the Faxworks Pro I used
> >DID allow printing to the fax from a DOS program like XyWrite, and
> >the faxes I produced were OK. Not so with WinFax / Win95.
>
> I'm getting very tired of this monolithic Windows95/98 which shuts out
> everything but itself.
>
> James D. Besser wrote:
> >Sadly, the last of my papers--most of which used XyWrite when I
> started--
> >recently converted to MS Word. I had to conduct informal seminars with
> >several reporters on how to continue writing in XyWrite, and sneakily
> import
> >into MsW just before sending stories along to editors.
>
> The same goes for MS Word. Why should one have to be sneaky about using
> different software?

Hear, hear! What i want to understand is that, with the exception of it being
easier for the network guys, how does using a wordprocessor that requries more
memory to load, creates larger files, takes up more disk space, is counter-
intuitive, and makes me LESS productive! Why is that EVEN an option?

(Might have something to do with the price? :)

I can't stand word, but have to use it for certain things, but use XY & NB for
all the others!

I think if everyone started demanding better software, or at least not buying
every new thing, that seems to just add to the code-blaoted software we have,
maybe we might have some quality sw again.

my 2 cents.

Russ


> We've had the same issues here. The MIS dept. has tried to pressure
> editorial into using MS Word for compatibility with their network (??).
> But, thankfully, we have prevailed and will continue using XyWrite.
>
> ============================
> Shawn Harrison
> Associate Editor
> Tyndale House Publishers
> shawn_harrison@xxxxxxxx
> ============================
> "The legal system is not fun, but it *is* an improvement
> over duels and feuds." --Harvey Harrison, attorney
>
>
>