[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][
Date Index][
Subject Index]
Re[2]: shorthand and more
- Subject: Re[2]: shorthand and more
- From: Emery Snyder emery.snyder@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 11:40:24 -0500
The unemployed where you live must be better served than they are
here. Here the price of the program would be almost a quarter of one's
weekly unemployment benefits, and (given that rent takes up about half
of them) much too expensive to consider purchasing.
On 16.2.2003, Yo Intl. YK wrote:
===8<==============Original message text===============
> At 15:13 Uhr -0000 16.02.2003, Robert Holmgren wrote:
>>Nah! In the rural town where I live (population 350), _nobody_ (apart
>>from the
>>unemployed) would need to work more than 10 hours to pay for this, and some
>>might buy it after as few as 3-5 hours!
> Well, and the unemployed would not even need to work for it.
> --
> -- Rene
===8<===========End of original message text===========