RE: Junk - off-topic - solution

[Peter Brown pbrown@xxxxxxxx]

Thanks to Robert, Judith, David, Dick, Michael (and Bob, in a personal note)
for all the great suggestions. And thanks to all for for forbearing to
flame me for being so naive. My kids insisted on AOL at home a few years
ago for instant messaging with their friends, but even they are fed up with
it by now.

Peter Brown
pbrown@xxxxxxxx

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Robert Orndorff [SMTP:orndorff@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent:	Saturday, January 27, 2001 12:09 PM
> To:	xywrite@xxxxxxxx
> Subject:	RE: Junk - off-topic - solution
>
> Earthlink, AT@T, and there's more. Take a look at the link below, they
> list literally dozens with national dial up numbers:
>
> http://webservices.cnet.com/html/aisles/Internet_Access.asp
>
> On 27 Jan 2001, at 10:36, Peter Brown wrote:
> > Agreed. But the main reason seems to be that you can access your one
> > account from local telephone numbers just about anywhere you travel. I
> > haven't shopped it, but if anyone knows of ISPs less annoying than AOL
> for
> > which this is true, I'd be delighted to hear about it (for the moment
> I'm
> > using AOL on my home computer).
> > Peter Brown
> > pbrown@xxxxxxxx
> >
> > > What I don't understand is why people use AOL, which adds junk to
> email,
> > > junk to your screen and is about as antithetical to the Xyway as one
> can
> > > get, internetly speaking. There are plenty of ISPs out there....
> > >
> > > --
> > >                   Regards,
> > >                   David
> > >
>
>
> --
> -Robert Orndorff
> Richmond, VA
> 
> http://www.rmonet.com