[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][ Date Index][ Subject Index]

Re: Year 2000 Problem



Frank Kenneth B. wrote:
>
> The only editor problem we are aware of is one dealing with date display
> on a DIR listing. New products will be corrected for that. Whether
> fixes for older editors will be made available has not been decided.
>
> K.
>

Hmm and hmmm . . . Oh yes: the year reads as 100 instead of 00. I think
we can live with this :-)

Oh, and did you read on the Internet somewhere (probably just an urban
legend) about the guy who suggested that we simply trick all the
computers in the world into thinking 2000 _is_ 1900 and go on from
there? As if! If for no other reason, the same post pointed out, 1900
wasn't a leap year but 2000 will be.

Regards,

--
Leslie Bialler
Columbia University Press
lb136@xxxxxxxx