[Date Prev][Date Next][Subject Prev][Subject Next][ Date Index][ Subject Index]

Re: Dos Box



Title: RE: Dos Box

   I envy Mr. Henderson the time to be a hobbyist. I note that after 15 years of radio
we had Jack Benny and Franklin Roosevelt at the flip of a switch, after 15 years of
automobiles we had the Model T, and 15 years of airplanes we had the fighter plane.
After 20 years of the PC we have what David Gelertner of Yale (victim of the
Unabomber) calls "the software mess."
.
   I am a writer/editor/journalist by trade and I have used a computer for fifteen years.
I don't know how to program it any more than I know how to tune my car's engine and
why should I? For writers, the most important advance in productivity since at least the
invention of pencil was the word-processing ability to reorganize material by moving
around words, sentences, paragraphs -- i.e., ideas --quickly and easily. In the days of
paper /typewriter, this was done by circling material, drawing lines, arrows, etc. and
finally -- cutting and pasting (sound familiar?) and then retyping. To do that, Hemingway
hired a secretary to do that; today he wouldn't have to, and he'd still have time to go fishing
in the afternoon.

   With Xywrite, a system was invented to try out the reorganization of ideas, see if they
worked better, and then to try again. The material never left the screen. I have written many
newspaper stories, articles, and two books, and edited half a dozen other books (all of which
appeared on the NYTimes annual list of notable books). During that period, I've saved maybe
one million keystrokes thanks to Xywrite, and a great deal of time and energy as compared to
Word (in addition to not using a mouse which can cause grave damage to the hand/wrist).
The alternative,Word, is truly retrograde; the nerds who devised it obviously do not write for a
living but simply copied the now anachronistic concept of cutting and pasting (during which
words actually leave your sight and take extra keystrokes to retrieve ). The Word inventors
seem to think that the way to emphasize ideas is simply to shout by putting them in boldface;
they hired a writer and editor for The Atlantic Monthly to tell them how to make their system
more attractive to writers. He gave up after six months, offering no improvements as far as I
can determine.
 
   As this monopoly spreads like a stain, the simple and elegant system that I learned within
ten days--as long as it took me to learn how to drive a car--is increasingly threatened by enforced
upgrades which masquerade as innovation but really are planned obsolescence. Preserving the
ability to use a simple and effective system is one reason why this chat group exists--and however
comforting and helpful, it really should not need to exist. If a software house could make a profit by
filling this niche market--and to do so it would need to know the  codes of the constantly changing
("improving") operating system--we wouldn't be wasting all this time exchanging tips about how to
keep our preferred stick-shift XYWrite system working without even a corner mechanic to help.
(Try to find one!)

    The parallel is exact; suppose GM had been a monopoly in 1940 and forced all cars to go
automatic instead of just Oldsmobile with its Hydramatic. Small cars would be impractical
(European small cars use stick shifts). The only hope is that someone will break this monopoly
as the Japanese and VW broke the Detroit oligopoly, and I guess that's what we'll have to wait
for. I don't look for much help from some hobbyist who thinks this is all just a game. As for the
antitrust people, they lost the election. The only congressman on your side is Orrin Hatch, because
WordPerfect is based in Utah. Everyone else seems to have been either bought out or bemused by MS.
 
Lawrence Malkin

----- Original Message -----
From: Brian.Henderson@xxxxxxxx
To: xywrite@xxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:46 AM
Subject: RE: Dos Box

I like to think of the current computer era as roughly equivalent to the early days of radio (and slightly less so of television) ownership. In the beginning, most radio owners were "hobbyists"...if they didn't actually build their own radios, they certainly tinkered extensively. Even in my earliest memories (the 50s), lots of folks were still doing all sorts of custom work with radio. And as we all know, today's electronics are pretty much idiot-proof (except for that nagging "flashing time" problem), and almost nobody builds their own anymore...hell nobody even FIXES them anymore.

20 years from now, when the word "computer" isn't even used anymore...we'll be thought as those amazing "oldtimers" who could actually build and program "future word for computer-like machines here."

-Brian Henderson

-----Original Message----- From: John Negus

Will there ever come a day when we can use a machine without having
to have knowledege of it - as opposed to the task we want to do with it?