Re: footnotes and endnotes

[Leslie Bialler lb136@xxxxxxxx]

Thanks! Glad to have comments on this from the "general public."

Emery Snyder wrote:

> I quite agree!
>
> Not an editor here, but consumer of scholarly books:
>
> If the references are in endnotes at the back anyway, so that I have
> to go back there and find them, why make me look backwards through the
> endnotes to find previous references to a book when author-date
> references to a single list of references makes the task easier?
>
> ---------------------------
> Wednesday, 12 March 2003, 10:41:50 AM, Leslie wrote:
>
> LB> No argument here!
>
> LB> Patricia M Godfrey wrote:
>
> >> . . . In fact, if I were editing such
> >> a work, I'd strongly recommend making one set into author-date
> >> references.
> >> Patricia
>
> LB> --
> LB> Leslie Bialler, Columbia University Press
> LB> lb136@xxxxxxxx
> LB> 61 W. 62 St, NYC 10023
> LB> 212-459-0600 X7109 (phone) 212-459-3677 (fax)
> >> http://www.columbia.edu/cu/cup

--
Leslie Bialler, Columbia University Press
lb136@xxxxxxxx
61 W. 62 St, NYC 10023
212-459-0600 X7109 (phone) 212-459-3677 (fax)
> http://www.columbia.edu/cu/cup