Title: RE: Windows SaveGets?It's not so much that I have a problem with NotaBene, it's that 90% of all the editing I do only requires plain ASCII, fast navigation, and sophisticated macro ability. That's doesn't seem to be what NotaBene was designed for.
I looked at it again and it still seems to be too much work to use in the simple ways I need an editor to function...although the ability to store text under most of the keys makes it attractive as an alternate editor.
BTW - I thought NotaBene had some sort of programming ability. I can't find anything that suggests that. Do they use a strange term for "macro" ?
-Bry
-----Original Message-----
From: Yo Intl. YK [mailto:rrr@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:43 PM
To: xywrite@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Windows SaveGets?
At 8:29 Uhr -0800 13.02.2002, Brian.Henderson@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
>What little I've seen of NotaBene, it has the same fatal flaw that Word
>has...it's so overbuilt that it's just too much trouble to use if all you
>want to do write. I need a program that can be used "keyboard only" (or
>mouse only, like a browser), AND with uncomplicated keystrokes.yes, it is overbuilt, but you can use it exactly the same way as XY-DOS,
with the same keystrokes, even with your old keyboard file. I do not
understand what your objection here is?
-- Rene von Rentzell, Tokyo (rrr @ twics.com)